Last year I had a course in programming with C++. They were 2nd year students, and they already got C# and Python. Then their dean called me and ask: "Look, Seva, I want to get them programming, not writing code. Can you?" That was a real challenge, so I gave the students a doubled course in C++ with a couple of last lectures on C++ and RAD principles. The institute is Moscow Polytech.


A week ago the most gifted students from my course called me and asked: "Seva Sir, could you please be our supervisor for the diploma project"? That was no hard decision, teaching programming was even a little bit better than programming myself. The guys wants to take all from the course and start building their carriers right now.


Their course is "Informatics and computer science (CAD systems integration in mechanical engineering)". The students are real professionals in using the ready CAD systems like Inventor. But the target is help them develop their own CAD system. Of course, with C++Builder.


There are some reasons of using C++Builder in order to study programming. Not coding, but developing the real-life systems. My reasons:

  • C++Builder is based on C++ standards, so coding skills are cross-industry universal (including STL);
  • C++Builder is the most comfortable visual IDE and set of tools for rapid application development (plethora of video tutorials);
  • C++Builder is multi-platform development tool, including mobile systems (students can show multi-platform skills);
  • C++Builder has FM, that makes 3D modeling and programming extremely easy (ideal for engineering programming);
  • C++Builder can mix 2D FM UI with 3D models in one form (prototyping of CAD UI is ultimately simple).

That's really enough to state C++Builder is the most appropriate tools to make the students develop a super project with good CAD capabilities within a year. But we've already started!


At the moment we're reproducing some simple 1-hour-project. The next step will be going deeper and split the code into visual models based on C++Builder built-in FM components and compositional derivatives and in-memory model for domain-specific object-oriented class representation of set of elements.

They can also use my book (sorry, in Russian), where 3D programming with Delphi is given, while 90% applicable to C++Builder. Next I share the students' results. 

  • Awesome. hope you will have some time to post some sample code
  • I am trying to develop a CAD tool for structural engineering using Delphi. I am trying to use Firemonkey as I wish to port it to the Mac also. Would like to have some insights into your CAD development in Firemonkey. Is there an English translation of your book, we can buy. Thanks
  • Great idea. I hope you will have some time to post some sample code. Maybe you could even publish some code from your Russian book.
  • If the pricing of the tools such as Delphi, C++Builder and RAD Studio was more reasonable for the capable editions (read: Enterprise, Architect etc), it can be a tremendously useful tool to use for teaching in colleges. The ease of development far surpasses other tools in the market - except, perhaps for Visual Studio. However, with Visual Studio you are stuck with just a single platform (+mobile). If Embarcadero does the following: 1. Make Delphi, C++Builder, RAD Studio run on Linux 2. Reduce the cost of the tools significantly - currently the costs are too high for even small to mid size companies to afford. 3. Run workshops at the college level If they do these things, Delphi, C++Builder etc will be unbeatable.
  • Hello, I'd like to say to students, go for the win! Congratulations Seva and cheers to dean. I would also like to mention one more "why", we know the concept is part of the standard but will add value to mention it: Parallel programming and multi-threading of C ++ Builder.